Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add unit tests for Source Files API methods #24

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

vorobeyme
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

    - add 'orderBy' and 'fields' fields to model
    - additional error checking in list methods
@vorobeyme vorobeyme changed the title Feat/source files tests test: add unit tests for Source Files API methods Apr 19, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.85%. Comparing base (863c69d) to head (0a479d7).

Files Patch % Lines
crowdin/source_files.go 0.00% 4 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #24       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   48.63%   61.85%   +13.22%     
===========================================
  Files          23       23               
  Lines        1094     1106       +12     
===========================================
+ Hits          532      684      +152     
+ Misses        519      375      -144     
- Partials       43       47        +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@andrii-bodnar andrii-bodnar merged commit c04d801 into main Apr 29, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@andrii-bodnar andrii-bodnar deleted the feat/source-files-tests branch April 29, 2024 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants