Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(auto-rules): Periodic archiver should not use http req to self #557

Conversation

jan-law
Copy link
Contributor

@jan-law jan-law commented Jul 6, 2021

Fixes #543

I renamed recordingCreationHelper to recordingHelper as it now contains helper functions to save and delete recordings. These helper functions are used in both PeriodicArchiver.java and TargetRecordingPatchSave.java.

@jan-law jan-law requested a review from andrewazores July 6, 2021 21:39
@jan-law jan-law changed the title Periodic archiver should not use http req to self cleanup(auto-rules) Periodic archiver should not use http req to self Jul 6, 2021
@andrewazores
Copy link
Member

andrewazores commented Jul 6, 2021 via email

@jan-law jan-law added the cleanup label Jul 6, 2021
@jan-law jan-law changed the title cleanup(auto-rules) Periodic archiver should not use http req to self chore(auto-rules) Periodic archiver should not use http req to self Jul 6, 2021
@jan-law jan-law changed the title chore(auto-rules) Periodic archiver should not use http req to self refactor(auto-rules) Periodic archiver should not use http req to self Jul 6, 2021
@jan-law
Copy link
Contributor Author

jan-law commented Jul 6, 2021

How do I add a release type to this pull request?

Error: No release type found in pull request title "refactor(auto-rules) Periodic archiver should not use http req to self".

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member

andrewazores commented Jul 6, 2021 via email

@jan-law jan-law changed the title refactor(auto-rules) Periodic archiver should not use http req to self refactor(auto-rules): Periodic archiver should not use http req to self Jul 6, 2021
@hareetd
Copy link
Contributor

hareetd commented Jul 6, 2021

@andrewazores Yeah, it does. I'll try to make the changes in my PR stay logically consistent with what @jan-law has done in the RecordingHelper.

andrewazores
andrewazores previously approved these changes Jul 7, 2021
Copy link
Member

@andrewazores andrewazores left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great other than those minor style things above.

@andrewazores andrewazores dismissed their stale review July 7, 2021 14:21

Meant to just leave feedback, not approve (yet)

@jan-law jan-law force-pushed the PeriodicArchiver-should-not-use-http-req-to-self branch from 3344448 to 6003262 Compare July 7, 2021 19:58
@jan-law jan-law force-pushed the PeriodicArchiver-should-not-use-http-req-to-self branch from 751a193 to a0323f2 Compare July 8, 2021 14:08
@andrewazores andrewazores merged commit 7aef023 into cryostatio:main Jul 8, 2021
@jan-law jan-law deleted the PeriodicArchiver-should-not-use-http-req-to-self branch July 8, 2021 17:57
@andrewazores andrewazores added this to In progress in API v2 via automation Jul 9, 2021
@andrewazores andrewazores added this to In progress in Recording Triggers via automation Jul 9, 2021
@andrewazores andrewazores moved this from In progress to Done in Recording Triggers Jul 12, 2021
@andrewazores andrewazores moved this from In progress to Done in API v2 Jul 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
API v2
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Automatic Rules PeriodicArchiver should not use HTTP requests to self
3 participants