-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
transaction.cpp check_authority() recursion end issue #631
Comments
This is a hardforking change. |
Yes, it is. Will add hard fork logic (and probably rebase). |
great catch abit. |
After some discussion we've decided that the hardfork patch above is rather complex and needs a ton of testing to validate, and it's actually better to just port abit's one-liner. |
It would be OK if nobody tried that in live network. However testnet will be broken anyway.. @xeroc any idea? |
testnet's purpose is to break things .. finally a success .. |
Merge release to develop
In transaction.cpp, this line should not
return false
, butcontinue
.Test case (see testnet http://testnet.bitshares.eu/#/account/level00/permissions/):
max_authority_depth
is 2level00
->level0
->level1
->level2-1
/level2-3
TEST
fromlevel00
tolevel0
level2-3
, the proposal doesn't executelevel2-1
, the proposal executesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: