Specs: check non hidden files are not pruned #330
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
straight-shoota
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2020
RX14
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2020
taylor
pushed a commit
to vulk/shards
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2020
f-fr
pushed a commit
to f-fr/shards
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This improves the coverage of the prune specs added when #57 was closed.
The hidden files are not removed because the
Dir[File.join(Shards.install_path, "*")]will not enumerate it by default. With this PR we are stressing the check that existing files (not directories) in the./libfolders are kept. And not because they are hidden.