New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FileNotFoundError - building 9.4.beta1 #639
Comments
I am currently writing an email to sage-release about that. |
Of course, Prefix just chews merrily through this with no error. Who knows what the result will be - it's still building. |
That's why it doesn't have visibility in vanilla. |
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/9c85a6c1cfea365260c67ea69717c5831fa47980/src/sage/features/databases.py#L90 and after should have used a |
Experimenting with a fix. |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.18, Repoman-3.0.2
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.18, Repoman-3.0.2
Should take care of things. Now I have troubles with gap during doc building. Scanning more tickets... |
Without this issue's commit doc building finishes on Prefix. |
Well, that's something. My machine is brand new and that's really the first build of sage-9999 and the doc on it. I wonder if I forgot to set some stuff in limits. |
Also try #629 to see if that is an issue? |
It looks quite distinct
with |
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31205 and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14779 are relevant to my case. Also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29314. |
doc building completes here on Gentoo (with this issue's fix). |
Perhaps not important but I have |
Could have an impact, I have done quite a bit of stuff in prep for gap 4.11.1 and a number of gap packages are updated as a consequence on this machine. |
Fails in a different spot. Still related to gap. This is very interesting how this breaks in spite of what it says in the various PackageInfo.g files from the various gap packages that things only need very low versions of gap. |
Reverting the update to primgrp and ctbllib did the trick. Not sure if one or the other was sufficient but pinning the gap minimum packages for a given version of gap may be a good idea. |
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31921 |
Patch updated to reflect the new understanding of the problem, align it with the branch on trac and be usable with the new |
I suspect this can be closed, Trac #31921 has been merged. |
Yes indeed. |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: