You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running a headless server with oneswarm is tedious right now (Xfvb trick etc.)
To really be able to use oneswarm, it should be possible to run a low-memory usage daemon on a server. The more lightweight it is the greater the adoption. This is a pretty big issue, but this separation for me is crucial (look at mlnet, transmission, dc++, etc.) This way people could contribute GUIs, web frontends, curses consoles etc...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree completely with arthurlutz.
In order for OneSwarm to function we need a light-weight (that means no java I'm afraid) server daemon which people can install on home servers, NAS:es with linux etc.
Running a headless server with oneswarm is tedious right now (Xfvb trick etc.)
To really be able to use oneswarm, it should be possible to run a low-memory usage daemon on a server. The more lightweight it is the greater the adoption. This is a pretty big issue, but this separation for me is crucial (look at mlnet, transmission, dc++, etc.) This way people could contribute GUIs, web frontends, curses consoles etc...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: