Notebooks for low-level benchmarking

[HealthyPear]

Description:

These are the notebooks that I developed in the framework of the protopipe-CTA/MARS comparison.
For the moment the structure is the following,

• DL1
  -- calibration
  -- image cleaning
• DL2
• DL3

As you probably guessed, this is similar to the one described here for the simple reason that I plan to export it once I am satisfied.

Meanwhile, this will make it easier for others to:

• crosscheck what I am doing in light of what I upload(ed) here
• adding new plots/benchmarks (I recall that there is already a reference we can use as a steering document)
• lay the ground for the future export to cta-benchmark / ctaplot

Caveats:

• currently dependent on the data format currently used by protopipe
• mono-telescope images are not taken into account in the official code, but I am using them in my tests (the changes are too big and aleatory at the moment to make a PR); this will be automatic with the new DL1 script.
• not completed; in particular I am working on image_cleaning so expect changes there (the material already present in calibration should be fine)

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

You'll be able to see Jupyter notebook diff and discuss changes. Powered by ReviewNB.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #42 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #42   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.43%   0.43%           
======================================
  Files          20      20           
  Lines        2084    2084           
======================================
  Hits            9       9           
  Misses       2075    2075

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5566a49...35f0c89. Read the comment docs.