JUnit formatter, classname contains only the features name

[litvinok]

In the testcase attribute name is the name of the test and classname of his group, which is often similar to the attribute name block testsuite.

[hron84]

-1 If i use one feature with more scenarios, it is good if if is put to separated file.

[mattwynne]

@hron84 I don't understand your objection - this looks like a reasonable way to use the JUnit file format, isn't it?

What would you lose if we merged in this patch?

[hron84]

@mattwynne ohh, I missed some points, I thought Jenkins flattens all tests under simple classes, but it was a mistake.

However, the current workflow is good for me because I don't need to scroll if I have a lot of scenario in a feature test. I have a cmdline JUnit XML parser to be able to run tests in same environment as Jenkins does to avoid failing tests caused by config difference.

However, if it really makes sense, I can agree it ,as because my main argument is not valid.

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.