Tags are a great way to organise your features and scenarios. Consider this example:
@billing Feature: Verify billing @important Scenario: Missing product description Scenario: Several products
A Scenario or feature can have as many tags as you like. Just separate them with spaces:
@billing @bicker @annoy Feature: Verify billing
Any tag that exists on a
Feature will be inherited by
Scenario Outline or
You can use the
--tags option to tell Cucumber that you only want to run features or scenarios that have (or don’t have) certain tags. Examples:
cucumber --tags @billing # Runs both scenarios cucumber --tags @important # Runs the first scenario cucumber --tags ~@important # Runs the second scenario (Scenarios without @important) cucumber --tags @billing --tags @important # Runs the first scenario (Scenarios with @important AND @billing) cucumber --tags @billing,@important # Runs both scenarios (Scenarios with @important OR @billing)
(Another way to “filter” what you want to run is to use the
file.feature:line pattern or the
--scenario option as described in Running Features).
Tags are also a great way to “link” your Cucumber features to other documents. For example, if you have to deal with old school requirements in a different system (Word, Excel, a wiki) you can refer to numbers:
@BJ-x98.77 @BJ-z12.33 Feature: Convert transaction
Another creative way to use tags is to keep track of where in the development process a certain feature is:
@qa_ready Feature: Index projects
Tags are also used in Tagged Hooks, which let you use tags to define what
After blocks get run for what scenarios.
As you may have seen in the previous examples Cucumber allows you to use logical ANDs and ORs to help gain greater control of what features to run.
Tags which are comma separated are ORed:
Example: Running scenarios which match @important OR @billing
cucumber --tags @billing,@important
Tags which are passed in separate —tags are ANDed
Example: Running scenarios which match @important AND @billing
cucumber --tags @billing --tags @important
You can combine these two methods to create powerful selection criteria:
Example: Running scenarios which match: (@billing OR @WIP) AND @important
cucumber --tags @billing,@wip --tags @important
Example: Skipping both @todo and @wip tags
cucumber --tags ~@todo --tags ~@wip
You can use this tag logic in your Hooks as well.
This feature was originally added in version 0.4.3. The logical behaviour of tags was later reversed in version 0.6.0.
It is currently not possible to override the tag filters from a profile.
The default profile, for example, includes a
--tags ~@wip filter. But what if you want to use everything from the default profile except the `—tags ~@wip` portion?
You might think you could just append something like this to the command line to “undo” the
--tags from the profile:
--tags @wip,~@wip (anything either tagged with @wip or not tagged with @wip)
But because that is effectively doing an “and” between
--tags ~@wip and
--tags @wip,~@wip, it does match any scenarios.
How can we override the tag filter then?
If you’re following Kanban principles, you want to limit the work in progress (WIP). The idea is that the fewer features or scenarios that being worked on simultaneously, the quicker you’ll be able to implement new features.
Cucumber can enforce this using tag limits. Here is an example:
cucumber --tags @dev:2,@qa:3
This will make cucumber fail if you have more than 2
@dev tags or more than 3
@qa tags, even if each of your scenarios pass individually.
Used in conjunction with the
--wip switch you can set up your project to enforce the WIP limits of your team.
@allow-rescue: Turns off Cucumber’s exception capturing for the tagged scenario(s). Used when the code being tested is expected to raise and handle exceptions.
@no-txn: Turns off transactions. See Browsers and Transactions.
Last edited by chrisbloom7,