Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] 2D Sparse Slicing + Row & Column Indexing #3659

Merged
merged 17 commits into from Aug 20, 2020

Conversation

cjnolet
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet commented Jul 24, 2020

This PR builds upon #3658, adding sparse column indexing.

…e-slicing_minor_indexing

Conflicts:
	cupyx/scipy/sparse/compressed.py
…e-slicing_minor_indexing

Conflicts:
	tests/cupyx_tests/scipy_tests/sparse_tests/test_index.py
…e-slicing_minor_indexing

Conflicts:
	cupyx/scipy/sparse/_index.py
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented Aug 20, 2020

@asi1024 Just merged master into this branch. This should be ready for review.

@kmaehashi kmaehashi removed the st:blocked-by-another-pr Blocked by another pull-request label Aug 20, 2020
return Bp, Aj_mask, col_counts, sort_idxs


_csr_column_index2_ker = core.ElementwiseKernel(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This kernel looks to work slowly in some cases for the same reasons as #3658 (comment), but it's OK to leave in this PR.

@asi1024
Copy link
Member

asi1024 commented Aug 20, 2020

Jenkins, test this please.

@asi1024 asi1024 added the cat:feature New features/APIs label Aug 20, 2020
@asi1024 asi1024 added this to the v8.0.0rc1 milestone Aug 20, 2020
@chainer-ci
Copy link
Member

Jenkins CI test (for commit 5ee4e1f, target branch master) succeeded!

@asi1024
Copy link
Member

asi1024 commented Aug 20, 2020

LGTM!

@asi1024 asi1024 merged commit e36ff84 into cupy:master Aug 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cat:feature New features/APIs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants