NTLM: check for features with #ifdef instead of #if #1367
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Feature defines are normally checked with #ifdef instead of #if in the rest of the codebase. Additionally, some compilers warn when a macro is implicitly evaluated to 0 because it is not defined, which was the case here. Ref: curl#1362 (comment)
|
@MarcelRaad, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @captain-caveman2k, @yangtse and @bagder to be potential reviewers. |
bagder
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2017
jay
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2017
|
Thanks for the reviews! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feature defines are normally checked with #ifdef instead of #if in the rest of
the codebase. Additionally, some compilers warn when a macro is implicitly
evaluated to 0 because it is not defined, which was the case here.
Ref: #1362 (comment)