New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

maketgz: switch to xz instead of lzma #1604

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@bagder
Member

bagder commented Jun 21, 2017

The compressed output size seems to be a tad bit smaller, but generally
xz seems more preferred these days and is used directly by for example
gentoo instead of bz2.

"Users of LZMA Utils should move to XZ Utils" =>
https://tukaani.org/lzma/

maketgz: switch to xz instead of lzma
The compressed output size seems to be a tad bit smaller, but generally
xz seems more preferred these days and is used directly by for example
gentoo instead of bz2.

"Users of LZMA Utils should move to XZ Utils" =>
https://tukaani.org/lzma/
@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

coveralls commented Jun 21, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.008%) to 73.793% when pulling 8c07a53 on bagder/xz into 8de8f4e on master.

@bagder bagder closed this in 0537238 Jun 21, 2017

@bagder bagder deleted the bagder/xz branch Jun 21, 2017

@dfandrich

This comment has been minimized.

Collaborator

dfandrich commented Jun 23, 2017

The daily snapshots stopped being built shortly after this was committed. Coincidence?

And on an unrelated note, the tradeoff for using xz -9 is much worse than for gzip. It drastically increases the amount of RAM required for decompressing, without improving compression for smaller-sized files. The docs say "it is good to avoid using the presets -7 ... -9 when there's no real need for them."

@bagder

This comment has been minimized.

Member

bagder commented Jun 23, 2017

Coincidence?

Nope, I managed to break the script when I updated it for the new extension! Fixed now.

the tradeoff for using xz -9 is much worse than for gzip

I changed it to -6e now, as that compresses almost as good. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment