gssapi: fix memory leak of output token in multi round context #1733
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When multiple rounds are needed to establish a security context (usually ntlm), we overwrite old token with a new one without free. Found by proposed gss tests using stub a gss implementation (by valgrind error), though I have confirmed the leak with a real gssapi implementation as well.
|
@Frenche, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @captain-caveman2k, @bagder and @vszakats to be potential reviewers. |
MarcelRaad
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. The Travis failure should hopefully be fixed by #1734.
|
Thanks a lot! |
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
When multiple rounds are needed to establish a security context
(usually ntlm), we overwrite old token with a new one without free.
Found by proposed gss tests using stub a gss implementation (by
valgrind error), though I have confirmed the leak with a real
gssapi implementation as well.
(detached from PR #1687)