djgpp: build fixes #6382
djgpp: build fixes #6382
Conversation
Allow 'Makefile.dist' to build both 'lib' and 'src'.
*) Allow using the Windows hosted djgpp cross compiler
to build for MSDOS under Windows.
*) 'USE_SSL' -> 'USE_OPENSSL'.
*) Added a 'link_EXE' macro. Etc, etc.
*) Linking 'curl.exe' needs '$(CURLX_CFILES)' too. *) Do not pick-up '../lib/djgpp/*.o' files. Recompile locally. *) Generate a gzipped 'tool_hugehelp.c' if 'USE_ZLIB=1'.
|
. |
Add another 'make' procedure.
|
|
||
| # | ||
| # Use zlib for contents encoding | ||
| # Use zlib for contents encoding. Needed for 'USE_OPENSSL=1' too. |
jay
Dec 28, 2020
Member
Since when is zlib needed for OpenSSL?
Since when is zlib needed for OpenSSL?
gvanem
Dec 29, 2020
Author
Contributor
It could be when perl Configure enable-zlib is used (what I used last time I built OpenSSL with djgpp).
No use of zlib.dll on MSDOS you know.
It could be when perl Configure enable-zlib is used (what I used last time I built OpenSSL with djgpp).
No use of zlib.dll on MSDOS you know.
jay
Dec 30, 2020
Member
It could be when perl Configure enable-zlib is used (what I used last time I built OpenSSL with djgpp).
Then I think you could say something like # May be needed if using static OpenSSL built with zlib enabled.
It could be when
perl Configure enable-zlibis used (what I used last time I built OpenSSL with djgpp).
Then I think you could say something like # May be needed if using static OpenSSL built with zlib enabled.
gvanem
Dec 30, 2020
Author
Contributor
Okay. But how about the syntax USE_ZLIB ?= 0. So one could do a make -f Makefile.dj USE_ZLIB=1 clean all.
Okay. But how about the syntax USE_ZLIB ?= 0. So one could do a make -f Makefile.dj USE_ZLIB=1 clean all.
jay
Dec 30, 2020
Member
But how about the syntax USE_ZLIB ?= 0
They should probably all be like that since there is no configure script
But how about the syntax
USE_ZLIB ?= 0
They should probably all be like that since there is no configure script
gvanem
Dec 31, 2020
Author
Contributor
Done that now.
Done that now.
|
. |
Previous warnings related to AFL fuzzy-functions are gone. Hence no need for that.
Clarify the 'conditional variable assignment' in 'common.dj'.
|
for next-feature-window |
|
Thanks. I landed this now because IMO djgpp build is broken without it so I see no point in waiting until the next release. I was not able to work with this PR the traditional way, it says it's from "unknown repository". Where is your curl fork? For posterity I'll note found a workaround, that I'm sure to forget. I added .patch to the URL then git am'd it, like this then I squashed all the commits into one via interactive rebase (so I could combine and edit all the commit messages), fetched upstream, rebased on upstream/master, checkout my master, merge --ff-only, review then push upstream. |
Sorry about that. I messed up my fork and hence deleted it. I'm still very little into these more advanced Git commands. |
Here are some fixes for
lib/Makefile.dj,src/Makefile.djand somepackages/DOS/files.Not many are using djgpp nowadays, but I've had these changes locally for ages. So now hopefully the diffs are out of the way.