build: restore old msdos, amigaos makefiles #9984
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vszakats
changed the title
vszakats
changed the title
vszakats
force-pushed
the
restore-old-msdos-amiga-makefiles
branch
from
0bc2b52
to
026372a
Compare
|
Pending discussions:
For now I'm siding this is a build environment problem and not a curl |
|
Closing with these conclusions/notes: #9764 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Makefile.mkchanges to experimental.Regression from a8861b6 (Partial revert)
Reported-by: Gisle Vanem
Fixes #9764 (comment)
Closes #xxxx
The extra clutter in
Makefile.mkthat belong to these two platorms is quite tiny: 23 lines. Extra 30 lines forWIN32-specific stuff, which can be removed if we support Windows-only here.[ Not saying that these couldn't be made work with
Makefile.mk, but I don't have the capacity to test/support the needs of these platforms. Also, supporting them seems to be difficult without hurting legibility of mingw32-specific logic. ]