You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The most jq-ish way to do it is to support modifiers that take a pipeline as their parameter, so that they can then see the output of the entire pipeline. The modifier will run the pipeline on its input and then can do something to the list of outputs
pokey
changed the title
Support modifiers that take a pipeline as their parameter
Support modifiers that can operate on list of targets, rather than seeing only one
Oct 9, 2022
The most
jq
-ish way to do it is to support modifiers that take a pipeline as their parameter, so that they can then see the output of the entire pipeline. The modifier will run the pipeline on its input and then can do something to the list of outputsBut @AndreasArvidsson has a compellingly simple proposal in #757 (comment); worth a discussion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: