Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Loosen up dependency version locking #68

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Oct 4, 2016
Merged

Conversation

blairham
Copy link

@blairham blairham commented Oct 4, 2016

Description

This changes the cookbook pinning from pessimistic pinning.

@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
issues_url 'https://github.com/cvent/octopus-deploy-cookbook/issues'
version '0.6.5'

depends 'windows', '~> 1.38'
depends 'windows_firewall', '~> 3.0.2'
depends 'windows', '>= 1.38.0'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am fine with removing the constraint on this entirely TBH. The windows cookbook is simply used to support legacy clients.

depends 'windows', '~> 1.38'
depends 'windows_firewall', '~> 3.0.2'
depends 'windows', '>= 1.38.0'
depends 'windows_firewall', '>= 3.0.2'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be '~> 3.0' This has a dependency on 3.0 at the moment. If that API changes then I want to update that explicitly

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fair enough on the windows_firewall cookbook.

@brentm5 brentm5 changed the title don't use pessimistic pinning Loosen up dependency version locking Oct 4, 2016
@brentm5 brentm5 merged commit f22bad1 into cvent:master Oct 4, 2016
@blairham blairham deleted the fixed-pinning branch October 4, 2016 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants