New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update conjur-authn-k8s-client version #1060
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is going to require updating the acknowledgements. If you feel up to it you can take a crack at it following the instructions in CONTRIBUTING, but if not I'm happy to do this when I am back online
I'd also prefer to wait to tag a version until @sgnn7 has his bug fix in
52390f1
to
f4e1c9f
Compare
Done. I updated the |
f4e1c9f
to
2a855c5
Compare
3df4f17
to
ae1f5f7
Compare
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
@@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](http://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0. | |||
|
|||
## [Unreleased] | |||
|
|||
## [1.5.0] - 2019-12-29 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't update the changelog - we do that when we're ready to tag a release
pkg/secretless/version.go
Outdated
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import "fmt" | |||
|
|||
// Version field is a SemVer that should indicate the baked-in version | |||
// of the broker | |||
var Version = "1.4.1" | |||
var Version = "1.5.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would not like to bump the version with this PR - please leave at 1.4.1 and we'll bump soon in a separate PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for integrating these changes, and updating the acknowledgements file @orenbm! I'd like to leave the version at 1.4.1 for now, and before we merge this PR I'd like to run through our manual tests to validate the change since they'll be impacted by it. That's going to take me a couple of days to do with the holiday, but hopefully we'll get this merged in shortly.
ae1f5f7
to
eda1d12
Compare
NOTICES.txt
Outdated
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | |||
limitations under the License. | |||
|
|||
|
|||
>>> github.com/cyberark/conjur-authn-k8s-client-0.13.0 | |||
>>> github.com/cyberark/conjur-authn-k8s-client-0.15.0 | |||
|
|||
Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the copyright actually changed in this version, can you please copy/paste the updated one here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done. nice catch.
eda1d12
to
10dac3d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @orenbm. This looks good, the only remaining item is the manual tests. I'll try to run through them tomorrow.
The method signature for NewFromEnv has changed that it takes no arguments and has default parameters instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks for making these updates @orenbm :)
Blocked by #1057
What does this PR do (include background context, if relevant)?
We released a new authn-client that adds the ability to authenticate hosts from anywhere in the policy branch. This PR updates the version of the conjur-authn-k8s-client that is used in this project
Tests for this feature are already implemented in
kubernetes-conjur-demo
.What ticket does this PR close?
Connected to cyberark/conjur#1239