You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am new to cyclosm and I like it a lot
I find natural parks border too heavy on the map. Dashed green is very similar to dashed blue (especially for colour blind people) so very often an invisible border looks like a path.
In my opinion cyclosm focus must be totally on paths/roads that can be cycled - border of national park is an accessory info that can be useful to a few people but misleading for a lot more people.
I suggest a lighter color for the border - or just a background of the area without (or with very faint) border
We have examples everywhere of problems with this heavy border
For instance:
near Milan we have a very large (with complex border) rural park (Parco Agricolo Sud) and cyclosm becomes a mess there
in the Netherlands for Eemmeer & Gooimeer Zuidoever
where you can think there's a bridge where there's not
I am new to cyclosm and I like it a lot
I find natural parks border too heavy on the map. Dashed green is very similar to dashed blue (especially for colour blind people) so very often an invisible border looks like a path.
In my opinion cyclosm focus must be totally on paths/roads that can be cycled - border of national park is an accessory info that can be useful to a few people but misleading for a lot more people.
I suggest a lighter color for the border - or just a background of the area without (or with very faint) border
We have examples everywhere of problems with this heavy border
For instance:
near Milan we have a very large (with complex border) rural park (Parco Agricolo Sud) and cyclosm becomes a mess there
![border1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/59602742/84285248-8753eb00-ab3d-11ea-85fb-1615ea903aa6.png)
in the Netherlands for Eemmeer & Gooimeer Zuidoever
![border2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/59602742/84285301-98046100-ab3d-11ea-9cd2-2303fdd0e0d2.png)
where you can think there's a bridge where there's not
Originally posted by @rem-maps in #37 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: