Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement test serialization methods for a single object #243

Closed
gonuke opened this issue Jul 6, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Implement test serialization methods for a single object #243

gonuke opened this issue Jul 6, 2012 · 4 comments
Assignees
@gonuke
Labels
Comp: Input Side Feature
Milestone
v0.3

Comments

@gonuke
Copy link
Member

gonuke commented Jul 6, 2012

In support of #27, implement a Boost serialization method for a necessary class to replace the passing of an XML position pointer.

Next action: designing solution using XML and libXML2
@ghost ghost assigned gonuke Jul 6, 2012
@gonuke
Copy link
Member Author

gonuke commented Jul 11, 2012

I am working on a strategy that will have an "XMLListener" that can take XML snippets and call the necessary "factory" to generate an object.

@gidden gidden mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2012
Closed
This was referenced Jul 16, 2012
Closed
Closed
@rwcarlsen rwcarlsen mentioned this issue Jul 16, 2012
Closed
katyhuff added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2012
@katyhuff
Merge pull request #348 from gonuke/XMLQueryEngine
ad0ed83 
XML query engine

Unsurprisingly, it builds and tests fine and cycamore builds fine against it. 
Excellent work! 
I'll pull it now, since I'm sure you'll have a chance to address the variable naming style stuff while you're working on related stuff in the near term.

I think this contributes to both #27 and #243, so I'm mentioning them in this message.
@scopatz
Copy link
Member

scopatz commented Jul 9, 2013

Most related issues seem to be closed. Is this closable? In any event, it doesn't seem needed for v0.2.

@gidden
Copy link
Member

gidden commented Jul 9, 2013

I would call this close-able because we've added the Query set of classes. @gonuke, I'll let you confirm.

@scopatz
Copy link
Member

scopatz commented Oct 23, 2013

The world is very different now. I am closing this as I believe it has been implemented. Please re-open if this is not the case.

@scopatz scopatz closed this as completed Oct 23, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gonuke gonuke

Labels
Comp: Input Side Feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@scopatz @gonuke @gidden