Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle "Redirect" blocking policy #8

Closed
madeye opened this issue Nov 29, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

Handle "Redirect" blocking policy #8

madeye opened this issue Nov 29, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@madeye
Copy link

madeye commented Nov 29, 2012

Some networks, e.g. a typical company intranet, will block connections by applying "redirect" policy. They often redirect blocked connections to a warning page or a login page. It means there could exist no reset or timeout for blocked sites. In some situations, we can even get HTTP 200 code when trying to reach a non-existent site.

Furthermore, some DNS pollution/injection techniques enable ISPs to do almost the same things for advisement. An example is that China telecom redirects users to 114 search when they are trying to visit a non-existent or blocked site.

@cyfdecyf
Copy link
Owner

I think it would be difficult to detect whether a site is actually blocked in that case. Do you have any suggestions?

The solution currently available in COW is to manually specify blocked sites in ~/.cow/blocked, so theoe sites would always use the parent socks proxy.

Best regards,
Chen Yufei

On 2012年11月29日Thursday at 下午3:06, Max Lv wrote:

Some networks, e.g. a typical company intranet, will block connections by applying "redirect" policy. They often redirect blocked connections to a warning page or a login page. It means there could exist no reset or timeout for blocked sites. In some situations, we can even get HTTP 200 code when trying to reach a non-existent site.
Furthermore, some DNS pollution/injection techniques enable ISPs to do almost the same things for advisement. An example is that China telecom redirects users to 114 search when they are trying to visit a non-existent or blocked site.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (#8).

@cyfdecyf cyfdecyf closed this as completed Dec 8, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants