W3C SWIG note process

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Need to address what happens with the old guide, and how to proceed re SWIG note

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Michael.Hausenblas on 7 Dec 2010 at 11:23

• Blocking: Revisiting voiD discovery #74
• Blocked on: Describe the graphs in a SPARQL endpoint #43, Explore adding a voiD term for URI prefixes #75, predicate for expressing dataset entry points #78, Update the voiD vocab to reflect all new and changed terms #82, Restructuring the voiD Guide #83, Check acknowledgements and sponsorship #88

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 7 Dec 2010 at 11:23

• Added labels: Milestone-Release2.0

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 7 Dec 2010 at 12:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Couple of things that come to mind:

+ once guide is stable, we will put it in the W3C space [1]
+ one should take an ACTION to slap the W3C ED style on the guide [2]
+ we need to send the draft to semantic-web@w3 and ask for feedback; 3 weeks 
time should be sufficient (01/2011 if we issue it in 12/2010)
+ feedback is handled via our Issue tracker, here; we reserve the right to 
postpone issues that might be hard to address to a later MS (3++)
+ once feedback is addressed, we request publication in the TR space

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/void/

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 7 Dec 2010 at 3:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

forgot [2] http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-ED.css

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 7 Dec 2010 at 3:10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Other things that need sorting out:

- What happens to the old URL of the Guide? Redirect? Leave?
- The old Guide still needs to be available somewhere so we can link to it from 
the new Guide when referencing the old stats module and the old autodiscovery 
scheme

Original comment by richard....@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2010 at 6:37

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Also announce void-discussion at public-lod

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 14 Dec 2010 at 11:05

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 14 Dec 2010 at 11:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 14 Dec 2010 at 11:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by richard....@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2010 at 12:07

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Michael to remove CC lic and do pubrules check

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 14 Dec 2010 at 12:31

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Michael to notify the SPARQL WG as well as the eGov IG regarding availability 
of ED (w/ customized msg - motivation, etc.)

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 14 Dec 2010 at 12:33

[GoogleCodeExporter]

See also recent discussion with DanBri on #swig [1]


[1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2010-12-14.html#T14-30-19

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 16 Dec 2010 at 8:34

[GoogleCodeExporter]

submitted it [1] - now it's up to DanBri ...

[1] https://groups.google.com/d/topic/void-discussion/yq01Phd6wzU/discussion

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 16 Dec 2010 at 1:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Excellent! Well done!

Original comment by jun.zhao...@googlemail.com on 16 Dec 2010 at 4:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I'm very happy being able to close this one - as per today 
http://www.w3.org/TR/void/ exists and with it this issue is history ;)

Original comment by Michael.Hausenblas on 3 Mar 2011 at 3:56

• Changed state: Fixed