Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add new experimental retries configuration #27412

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023

Conversation

AtofStryker
Copy link
Contributor

@AtofStryker AtofStryker commented Jul 27, 2023

  • Closes N/A

Additional details

Introduces the experimentalStrategy and experimentalOptions keys inside the retries configuration object.

The config validation for this is a bit wonky in order to support the currently supported config of runMode and openMode. If none of the experimental keys are present, runMode and openMode can be the current API. However, if experimentalStrategy is provided, runMode and openMode MUST be booleans. Additionally, if the experimentalStrategy is valid, and experimentalOptions are provided, both keys MUST be present.

To display the experiment correctly, there is some hackiness to get the experimental values to display correctly in the Project Settings page. Since we do not support nested experimental flags inside traditional config, I figured it would be best to provide a one off for retries to check the experimental config options. When we remove the new retry logic out of experimental and into GA, we can remove this work around.

with experimentalStrategy and experimentalOptions enabled

with only experimentalStrategy enabled

with neither enabled

Steps to test

How has the user experience changed?

PR Tasks

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jul 27, 2023

38 flaky tests on run #49273 ↗︎

0 27952 1349 0 Flakiness 38

Details:

[run ci]
Project: cypress Commit: b8a14e785d
Status: Passed Duration: 20:32 💡
Started: Jul 27, 2023 10:22 PM Ended: Jul 27, 2023 10:42 PM
Flakiness  commands/net_stubbing.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View Output Video

Test Artifacts
network stubbing > intercepting request > can delay and throttle a StaticResponse Output Video
Flakiness  e2e/origin/commands/traversal.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View Output Video

Test Artifacts
cy.origin traversal > .children() Output Video
Flakiness  e2e/origin/commands/screenshot.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View Output Video

Test Artifacts
cy.origin screenshot > set viewport > captures the fullPage Output Video
Flakiness  e2e/origin/commands/navigation.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View Output Video

Test Artifacts
cy.origin navigation > .go() Output Video
Flakiness  e2e/origin/commands/querying_shadow.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View Output Video

Test Artifacts
cy.origin shadow dom > .shadow() Output Video

The first 5 flaky specs are shown, see all 27 specs in Cypress Cloud.

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings.

@AtofStryker AtofStryker changed the title Feat/add retries config feat: add new experimental retries configuration Jul 27, 2023
@AtofStryker AtofStryker marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2023 22:11

// if options aren't present (either undefined or null) or are configured correctly, return true
if (isValidStrategy && isValidRunAndOpenModeConfigWithStrategy && (
experimentalConfigOptions.experimentalOptions == null ||
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should bounce on null here since it isn't a valid option. its either undefined or what is expected for the given strategy.

Suggested change
experimentalConfigOptions.experimentalOptions == null ||
experimentalConfigOptions.experimentalOptions === undefined ||

@@ -2838,6 +2838,30 @@ declare namespace Cypress {
certs: PEMCert[] | PFXCert[]
}

type RetryStrategyWithModeSpecs = RetryStrategy & {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ryanpei did you want retries to be false for the experimental release? At least for experimental, it feels like it has the same behavior as configuring nothing and having runMode and openMode both set to 0

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AtofStryker yes, I agree it should be default false.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ryanpei I think what I am saying is setting it to false would break the API for experimental, but it essentially has the same effect as the default for the current API so it should be fine to leave it the way it is for experimental release

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AtofStryker I see, so if they set retries false, they won't see any errors or anything, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ryanpei what I am saying is setting retries to false wouldn't be an option for experimental since it changes the API. To tweak retries, the user would need to provide openMode and runMode with booleans and provide an experimental strategy.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see so this is a breaking change for anyone who has set retries: false? There's no way to fallback to the old API, in this case?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can we would need to code for it though, which for an experimental release I am not sure of the value since it would be the same thing as the current default.


// get experimental retry properties on the 'retries' config object. Mutate the experimentalConfigurations array as to not have side effects with props.gql.config
// TODO: remove this once experimentalRetries becomes GA. This is to be treated as a one off as supported nested experiments inside config is rare.
const { value: { experimentalStrategy, experimentalOptions, from } } = props.gql?.config.find((item) => item.field === 'retries')
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the hack I was mentioning in the PR description. Figured its OK for a one off, but something we want to remove once the experiment is done.

}

// if the strategy is 'detect-flake-but-always-fail', stopIfAnyPassed must be provided and must be a boolean
if (strategy === 'detect-flake-but-always-fail') {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should I update these comments to include given a valid 'maxRetries' or is that implied from above?

}

return errMsg(key, value, 'a positive number or null or an object with keys "openMode" and "runMode" with values of numbers or nulls')
return errMsg(key, value, 'a positive number or null or an object with keys "openMode" and "runMode" with values of numbers, booleans, or nulls, or experimental configuration with key "experimentalStrategy" with value "detect-flake-but-always-fail" or "detect-flake-and-pass-on-threshold" and key "experimentalOptions" to provide a valid configuration for your selected strategy')
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ryanpei I think I might need some suggestions on the messaging here, as this is really confusing 😅

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, yea I don't know how I would simplify this in this current format. I guess our options would be either:

  1. Link to a doc instead of explaining this all in-line
  2. Break up the error message into conditional parts, so that it isn't just one error message to cover all cases.

I think I lean towards the latter.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At least for now I'm kinda leaning on keeping the long error message and we can decide what we'd like to do as we iterate on this, but I think it's something that for sure needs to improve.

@AtofStryker AtofStryker merged commit ef84f03 into feature/test-burn-in Aug 1, 2023
81 of 87 checks passed
@AtofStryker AtofStryker deleted the feat/add_retries_config branch August 1, 2023 21:23
@AtofStryker AtofStryker mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2023
3 tasks
cacieprins added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2023
* chore: set up feature/test-burn-in feature branch

* feat: add burnIn Configuration option (currently a no-op) (#27377)

* feat: add the burnIn Configuration to the config package. Option
currently is a no-op

* chore: make burn in experimental

* chore: set experimentalBurnIn to false by default

* feat: add new experimental retries configuration (#27412)

* feat: implement the experimental retries configuration options to pair
with test burn in

* [run ci]

* fix cache invalidation [run ci]

* fix snapshot added in v13 for module api to include test burn in experimentalflag

* chore: fix merge conflict

* chore: add burnInTestAction capability (#27768)

* add burnInTestAction capability

* feat: add burn in capability for cloud

* chore: fix snapshot for record_spec

* feat: implement experimental retries (#27826)

* chore: format the retries/runner snapshot files to make diff easier

* feat: implement experimentalRetries strategies 'detect-flake-and-pass-on-threshold' and 'detect-flake-but-always-fail'. This should not be a breaking change, though it does modify mocha and the test object even when the experiment is not configured. This is to exercise the system and make sure things still work as expected even when we go GA. Test updates will follow in following commits.

* chore: update snapshots from system tests and cy-in-cy tests that now have the cypress test metadata property _cypressTestStatusInfo. tests have been added in the fail-with-[before|after]each specs to visually see the suite being skipped when developing.

* chore: add cy-in-cy tests to verify reporter behavior for pass/fail tests, as well as new mocha snapshots to verify attempts. New tests were needed for this as the 'retries' option in testConfigOverrides currently is and will be invalid for experiment and will function as an override. tests run in the cy-in-cy tests are using globally configured experimentalRetries for the given tested project, which showcases the different behavior between attempts/retries and pass/fail status.

* chore: add unit test like driver test to verify the test object in mocha is decorated/handled properly in calculateTestStatus

* chore: add sanity system tests to verify console reporter output for experimental retries logic. Currently there is a bug in the reporter where the logged status doesnt wait for the aftereach to complete, which impacts the total exitCode and printed status.

* fix: aftereach console output. make sure to fail the test in the appropriate spot in runner.ts and not prematurely, which in turn updates the snapshots for cy-in-cy as the fail event comes later."

* chore: address comments from code review

* fix: make sure hook failures print outer status + attempts when the error is the hook itself.

* chore: improve types within calculateTestStatus inside mocha.ts

* Revert "feat: add burnIn Configuration option (currently a no-op) (#27377)"

This reverts commit c428443.

* Revert "chore: add burnInTestAction capability (#27768)"

This reverts commit ae3df1a.

* chore: run snapshot and binary jobs against experimental retries feature branch

* chore: add changelog entry (wip)

* Revert "fix snapshot added in v13 for module api to include test burn in experimentalflag"

This reverts commit bb5046c.

* Fix system tests

* Clear CircleCI cache

* Normalize retries config for test execution

* Fixed some unit tests

* update snapshots for newer test metadata

* Fix cy-in-cy snapshots

* update snapshots

* bump cache version

* chore: ensure legacy retry overrides work; reject exp. retries overrides (#28045)

* update changelog

* flip if statement in experimental retries option validation

* refactor invalid experimental retry override for more useful error msg

* revert testConfigOverrides snapshot

* update snapshots for test override sys test

* Update packages/config/src/validation.ts

Co-authored-by: Chris Breiding <chrisbreiding@users.noreply.github.com>

* succinct changelog entry; links to docs for details

* testConfigOverride system test snapshots

* Update .github/workflows/update_v8_snapshot_cache.yml

Co-authored-by: Ryan Manuel <ryanm@cypress.io>

* Update cli/CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Ryan Manuel <ryanm@cypress.io>

* Update packages/driver/src/cypress.ts

Co-authored-by: Ryan Manuel <ryanm@cypress.io>

* updating cache-version

* improve typescript usage when appending experimental retry options to experiments in Experimenets.vue

* Revert "improve typescript usage when appending experimental retry options to experiments in Experimenets.vue"

This reverts commit b459aba.

* refactor test config override validation for experimental retry subkeys

* account for error throw differences in browsers in system tests

* bump circle cache

* bump circle cache again

---------

Co-authored-by: astone123 <adams@cypress.io>
Co-authored-by: mabela416 <mabel@cypress.io>
Co-authored-by: Muaz Othman <muaz@cypress.io>
Co-authored-by: Muaz Othman <muazweb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Cacie Prins <cacie@cypress.io>
Co-authored-by: Cacie Prins <cacieprins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Breiding <chrisbreiding@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Manuel <ryanm@cypress.io>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Schile <mschile@cypress.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants