Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decaff modes, cypress, scaffold and related tests. #6038

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 27, 2019

Conversation

sainthkh
Copy link
Contributor

@sainthkh sainthkh commented Dec 24, 2019

Preparation for #619.

NEVER SQUASH THIS PR

@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented Dec 24, 2019

Thanks for the contribution! Below are some guidelines Cypress uses when doing PR reviews.

  • Please write [WIP] in the title of your Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review - someone will review your PR as soon as the [WIP] is removed.
  • Please familiarize yourself with the PR Review Checklist and feel free to make updates on your PR based on these guidelines.

PR Review Checklist

If any of the following requirements can't be met, leave a comment in the review selecting 'Request changes', otherwise 'Approve'.

User Experience

  • The feature/bugfix is self-documenting from within the product.
  • The change provides the end user with a way to fix their problem (no dead ends).

Functionality

  • The code works and performs its intended function with the correct logic.
  • Performance has been factored in (for example, the code cleans up after itself to not cause memory leaks).
  • The code guards against edge cases and invalid input and has tests to cover it.

Maintainability

  • The code is readable (too many nested 'if's are a bad sign).
  • Names used for variables, methods, etc, clearly describe their function.
  • The code is easy to understood and there are relevant comments explaining.
  • New algorithms are documented in the code with link(s) to external docs (flowcharts, w3c, chrome, firefox).
  • There are comments containing link(s) to the addressed issue (in tests and code).

Quality

  • The change does not reimplement code.
  • There's not a module from the ecosystem that should be used instead.
  • There is no redundant or duplicate code.
  • There are no irrelevant comments left in the code.
  • Tests are testing the code’s intended functionality in the best way possible.

Internal

  • The original issue has been tagged with a release in ZenHub.

@sainthkh sainthkh force-pushed the issue-619-decaff branch 2 times, most recently from 64784d9 to c183fbb Compare December 24, 2019 07:14
@sainthkh sainthkh marked this pull request as ready for review December 24, 2019 07:56
@sainthkh sainthkh changed the title WIP Decaff modes, cypress, scaffold and related tests. Decaff modes, cypress, scaffold and related tests. Dec 24, 2019
flotwig
flotwig previously approved these changes Dec 27, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@flotwig flotwig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good after reverting changes to the scaffold snapshot. thanks!

@flotwig flotwig merged commit 029ed01 into cypress-io:develop Dec 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants