You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From our discussion on mantis and the metadata scaling @talonchandler@ziw-liu , I have found that iohub converts and adds the scale metadata to both the top of the 'pyramid' and the highest resolution level.
Should the normal behavior be to write into the datasets dictionary rather than the higher level coordinateTransformation as shown below or should the the highest level (top of pyramid) always be "scale":[1,1,1,1,1]" Since the ngff.Position.scale, always looks for the highest resolution, then shouldn't we leave the top level of the pyramid to be untouched (?)
From our discussion on mantis and the metadata scaling @talonchandler @ziw-liu , I have found that iohub converts and adds the scale metadata to both the top of the 'pyramid' and the highest resolution level.
Should the normal behavior be to write into the
datasets
dictionary rather than the higher levelcoordinateTransformation
as shown below or should the the highest level (top of pyramid) always be"scale":[1,1,1,1,1]"
Since thengff.Position.scale
, always looks for the highest resolution, then shouldn't we leave the top level of the pyramid to be untouched (?)/hpc/projects/comp.micro/mantis/2023_08_09_HEK_PCNA_H2B/0-zarr/pcna_rac1_virtual_staining_1/pcna_rac1_virtual_staining_labelfree_1.zarr/0/0/0/.zattrs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: