Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to divide 300VW-Dataset into 3 categories #72

Closed
QcQcM opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

How to divide 300VW-Dataset into 3 categories #72

QcQcM opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@QcQcM
Copy link

QcQcM commented Oct 27, 2020

Which project are you using?

SBR

Issue description

Hi,I have noticed in the paper of SBR
"300-VW [30, 34, 6]. This video dataset contains 50 training videos with 95192 frames. The test set consists of
three categories with different levels. These three subsets (A, B and C) have 62135, 32805 and 26338 frames, respectively. C is the most challenging one."
and in many articles about face landmark detection based on video,they have also mentioned the 3 categories of 300VW and done some comparison separately in 3 scenarios.
But for the 300VW data set I have downloaded, neither train/test set nor category-A/ category-B/category-C is divided.
So I wanna to ask whether the 3 categories have been divided before download, or you divide it according to the requirements of the official website?
(the official website link is https://ibug.doc.ic.ac.uk/resources/300-VW/)
I have tried to divide it by myself, but the test result of my model is weird. My model's performance is better in category C.

I really hope to get your answer,because I don't have any classmates who do the same direction as me ,and there is very little information about this detail

Thx a lot!!!

@D-X-Y
Copy link
Owner

D-X-Y commented Nov 6, 2020

Here is the video id for the three test category (1 for A, 2 for B, 2 for C): https://github.com/D-X-Y/landmark-detection/blob/master/SBR/cache_data/generate_300VW.py#L98
I found these ids somewhere three years ago, and forget the original sources. But I think you use re-use them safely.

@D-X-Y D-X-Y closed this as completed Nov 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants