Fix black (#8288)

### Summary & Motivation ### How I Tested These Changes
dagster-io · Jun 9, 2022 · d14ae4c · d14ae4c · vercel · Jun 9, 2022
1 parent 947a9f6
commit d14ae4c
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/content/concepts/testing.mdx b/docs/content/concepts/testing.mdx
@@ -298,5 +298,7 @@ You can also provide input values using <PyObject object="JobDefinition" method=
 ```python file=/concepts/ops_jobs_graphs/jobs.py startafter=start_execute_in_process_input endbefore=end_execute_in_process_input
 graph_result = wires_input.execute_in_process(input_values={"x": 5})
 
-job_result = the_job.execute_in_process(input_values={"x": 6})  # Overrides existing input value
+job_result = the_job.execute_in_process(
+    input_values={"x": 6}
+)  # Overrides existing input value
 ```
diff --git a/examples/docs_snippets/docs_snippets/concepts/ops_jobs_graphs/jobs.py b/examples/docs_snippets/docs_snippets/concepts/ops_jobs_graphs/jobs.py
@@ -99,5 +99,7 @@ def wires_input(x):
 # start_execute_in_process_input
 graph_result = wires_input.execute_in_process(input_values={"x": 5})
 
-job_result = the_job.execute_in_process(input_values={"x": 6})  # Overrides existing input value
+job_result = the_job.execute_in_process(
+    input_values={"x": 6}
+)  # Overrides existing input value
 # end_execute_in_process_input