Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for boto3 == 1.10.* #2418

Closed
lee335 opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for boto3 == 1.10.* #2418

lee335 opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lee335
Copy link

lee335 commented Apr 30, 2020

Hi, first of all thanks for the great tool that you are developing. We are currently building our data infrastructure using dagster at our company.

We encountered a dependency problem using dagster-aws with the newest versions of sagemaker (> 1.49.0) that support tensorflow 2.

sagemaker needs boto3>=1.10.32, but dagster-aws currently only supports boto3==1.9.*

When are you planning to update your boto3 dependency to 1.10.* ?

Unfortunately we cannot use an older sagemaker version, because we need tensorflow 2 support.

Until then, is it critical to use dagster-aws with boto3>=1.10.32?

@schrockn schrockn self-assigned this Apr 30, 2020
@schrockn
Copy link
Member

Thanks for reporting. This pinning appears totally unnecessary. See https://dagster.phacility.com/D2723

This fix should go out in today's release.

schrockn pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 30, 2020
Summary:
We had pinned boto3 a very, very long time
ago seemingly for no good reason.

#2418

Test Plan: BK

Reviewers: nate, max

Reviewed By: nate

Differential Revision: https://dagster.phacility.com/D2723
@lee335
Copy link
Author

lee335 commented Apr 30, 2020

Thank you very much for the fast response! We are looking forward for today's release.

@schrockn
Copy link
Member

Great! Please feel free to reach out to us on slack. Always interested to hear how folks are using th the project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants