Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose message timestamps #109

Closed
josteinaj opened this issue Apr 21, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Expose message timestamps #109

josteinaj opened this issue Apr 21, 2016 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@josteinaj
Copy link
Member

Messages (used for the job execution log) in the framework each seem to have a timeStamp. It could be useful if this field were exposed through the Web API. Possibly as an integer: the amount of milliseconds since the job was started.

The time for job created/started/finished would also be useful if possible.

@josteinaj
Copy link
Member Author

This field is actually required for progress messages as I've currently implemented them to work properly. I could change the implementation, but it would be really nice if the message timestamps were simply exposed instead. Either unix time in milliseconds, alternatively time since job started in milliseconds, would be fine.

CC @capitancambio @bertfrees

josteinaj added a commit to daisy/pipeline-webui that referenced this issue May 25, 2016
- load messages separately from the rest of the job info
- estimate timestamps. see: daisy/pipeline-framework#109
- use message depth to nest messages in the log; depth 0 and 1 are top-level, other levels are nested
- all messages are displayed at the top regardless of message depth
- filter out messages that are empty
- ability to toggle sub-message lists
- top-level messages gets colored red or yellow (error/warning) if one of its child messages have that color
@bertfrees
Copy link
Member

This was fixed in 6fbf82f.

@bertfrees bertfrees added this to the v1.12.0 milestone Mar 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants