Decouple user id field changeset in template #192
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danschultzer
force-pushed
the
decouple-user-id-field
branch
from
ffb0945
to
9b50039
Compare
danschultzer
force-pushed
the
decouple-user-id-field
branch
from
9b50039
to
f7d9438
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on https://elixirforum.com/t/using-pow-without-ecto-or-an-rdbms/22496 I have been looking at how to decouple Phoenix from Ecto. This is the final piece for decoupling it completely. I think maybe protocols can be used.