When Consul is used as a name resolution component, the same appid cannot achieve load balancing, and the dapr started later will overwrite the previous dapr

[cysnet]

I started two backend services on two dapr instances, but only the backend started later in consul, and load balancing cannot be achieved.
One instance ip is 192.168.43.131, another is 192.168.43.132. But only the one started later can be registed in consul.

And the config of the two dapr instances have the same content just as below:

apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
metadata:
  name: daprConfig
spec:
  nameResolution:
    component: "consul"
    configuration:
      client:
        address: "192.168.43.133:8500"
      selfRegister: true

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged (pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved) or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[lysilver]

dapr version 1.5
Dapr registers with Consul. After the same appid, one service takes the place of the first service

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged (pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved) or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved. Thank you for your contributions.

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved. Thank you for your contributions.

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved. Thank you for your contributions.

[shiling02404]

The same problem was found

[yaron2]

Reopened. We will fix this.

[cysnet]

Reopened. We will fix this.

It will be very helpful if this issue fixed in the future.

[yaron2]

Triaged for the next release.

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged (pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved) or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved. Thank you for your contributions.

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved. Thank you for your contributions.