Update the License from MIT to Apache 2.0 as required by CNCF submission

[msfussell]

The CNCF submission cncf/toc#738 requires the license to be Apache 2.0 in all repos, other than Documentation which is creative commons, which has a separate tracking issue for the license.

This issue to to update to Apache 2.0 license in the repos (other than docs) to the same as this one in KEDA in https://github.com/kedacore/keda/blob/main/LICENSE

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged (pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved) or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[dapr-bot]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as pinned, good first issue, help wanted or triaged/resolved. Thank you for your contributions.

[shubham1172]

@msfussell @greenie-msft @wcs1only there are still some repos with non-Apache licenses. Should we update their licenses too?

Repo	Current License	PR
https://github.com/dapr/helm-charts	none	dapr/helm-charts#15
https://github.com/dapr/generator-dapr	none	dapr-sandbox/generator-dapr#30
https://github.com/dapr/samples	MIT	dapr/samples#86
https://github.com/dapr/setup-dapr	MIT	dapr/setup-dapr#30
https://github.com/dapr/ApplicationInsights-LocalForwarder	MIT	dapr/ApplicationInsights-LocalForwarder#1
https://github.com/dapr/workflows	MIT	dapr-sandbox/dapr-logicapps-extension#77
https://github.com/dapr/azure-functions-extension	MIT	Azure/azure-functions-dapr-extension#74

[dapr-bot]

Yes. We should update all of them.

[mukundansundar]

Being worked on.

[shubham1172]

/assign

[shubham1172]

Updated #3911 (comment) with the existing open PRs for updating license. @mukundansundar can you please help to close the PRs?