You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(BTW, I’m new to free software dev, so please forgive netiquette mistakes I will make.) Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As a user, I am frustrated when I cannot expose my image for skin tones at ~60 IRE. The issue is, that if I expose the image for the forehead by using the “Exposure” slider and the adjacent area selection in the module of the same name, it will try to average the exposure of the forehead to ~50 IRE, therefore to low. By moving the slider blindly, I can never come anywhere near where I want to expose the skin tones to.
Describe the solution you'd like
As a user, I want to be able to preview exposure levels of each pixel in the entire image simultaneously, such that I can accurately expose for certain areas of the image.
I would wish that the False Colour would work like in the linked thread; I got a special button in the indicator menu bar where I can see a False Colour Exposure preview of the current image in the viewscreen.
The solution using LUTs is suboptimal. It would be preferable and by far more accurate, if the module were to take an available luminance value for a given pixel, such as the L component in the LAB model and place them on an IRE scale.
Alternatives
While I am aware of the existence of the deprecated “Zone-Tool”, I would like a special preview, hence I think that is more useful than said Zone-Tool, as it clearly shows the effects of any luminance altering module directly on the image.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BAGELGENESIS
changed the title
False Colour Exposure Preview
[enhancement] False Colour Exposure Preview
Oct 25, 2023
BAGELGENESIS
changed the title
[enhancement] False Colour Exposure Preview
[feature: new] False Colour Exposure Preview
Oct 25, 2023
BAGELGENESIS
changed the title
[feature: new] False Colour Exposure Preview
False Colour Exposure Preview [feature: new] [difficulty: good first contribution]
Oct 25, 2023
I would recommend that you remove your difficulty assessment from the title. It is unlikely that anyone unfamiliar with the code would be able to implement this for you and would potentially discourage those with that ability to even read your request.
BAGELGENESIS
changed the title
False Colour Exposure Preview [feature: new] [difficulty: good first contribution]
False Colour Exposure Preview [feature: new]
Oct 26, 2023
This issue has been marked as stale due to inactivity for the last 60 days. It will be automatically closed in 300 days if no update occurs. Please check if the master branch has fixed it and report again or close the issue.
(BTW, I’m new to free software dev, so please forgive netiquette mistakes I will make.)
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As a user, I am frustrated when I cannot expose my image for skin tones at ~60 IRE. The issue is, that if I expose the image for the forehead by using the “Exposure” slider and the adjacent area selection in the module of the same name, it will try to average the exposure of the forehead to ~50 IRE, therefore to low. By moving the slider blindly, I can never come anywhere near where I want to expose the skin tones to.
Describe the solution you'd like
As a user, I want to be able to preview exposure levels of each pixel in the entire image simultaneously, such that I can accurately expose for certain areas of the image.
I would wish that the False Colour would work like in the linked thread; I got a special button in the indicator menu bar where I can see a False Colour Exposure preview of the current image in the viewscreen.
Examples:
https://d2x313g9lpht1q.cloudfront.net/original/3X/7/b/7be03abf3011287272fd833d5c5aa83be4c7c53f.png
https://d2x313g9lpht1q.cloudfront.net/original/3X/e/e/ee610095ff9110058b348d739300b9742961ebe9.png
The solution using LUTs is suboptimal. It would be preferable and by far more accurate, if the module were to take an available luminance value for a given pixel, such as the L component in the LAB model and place them on an IRE scale.
Alternatives
While I am aware of the existence of the deprecated “Zone-Tool”, I would like a special preview, hence I think that is more useful than said Zone-Tool, as it clearly shows the effects of any luminance altering module directly on the image.
Sources
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: