Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect interpretation of parameter #1

Open
darribas opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Incorrect interpretation of parameter #1

darribas opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@darribas
Copy link
Owner

The interpretation of the IMD parameter in the non-spatial regression section is incorrect. Where it reads:

a unit increase in the degree of deprivation is associated with a 0.2% decrease in the price of a house

should read:

a unit increase in the degree of deprivation is associated with a 25% decrease in the price of a house

This comes from the fact it is a log-linear functional form that can be interpreted, following Gelman & Hill (2006), as:

\beta = 0.2456446 \rightarrow exp(\beta) = 1.28

which implies a 28% increase in the non-log price variable we have as dependent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant