This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
fix: additional cases for use-setstate-synchronously
#1136
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1136 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.51% 85.48% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 347 347
Lines 7790 7839 +49
==========================================
+ Hits 6662 6701 +39
- Misses 1128 1138 +10
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
tryandswitchbranches, closes [BUG]use-setstate-synchronouslywith switch cases and exception on handling. #1133breakandcontinuein control flow statementsIs there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?