New features for 1.0.0-beta #52
Conversation
| @@ -210,8 +240,13 @@ abstract class AbstractExpressionMixin implements ExpressionBuilder { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| @override | |||
| ExpressionBuilder increment([bool prefix = false]) { | |||
| return new _IncrementExpression(this, prefix); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nit] how are you choosing between => and return? Why is this one different from decrement above?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Trying not to use => when it creates a new line, but probably inconsistent.
| ExpressionBuilder identical(ExpressionBuilder other) { | ||
| return lib$core.identical.call([ | ||
| return lib$core.identical.call(<ExpressionBuilder>[ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this fixing an analyzer warning? I'd be surprised if this wasn't inferred in strong mode...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it could not infer the type and warned as such.
| @@ -186,7 +186,18 @@ abstract class ConstructorBuilder | |||
| HasStatements, | |||
| ValidClassMember { | |||
| /// Create a new [ConstructorBuilder], optionally with a [name]. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Doc comment is no longer complete. This is a case where we can add useful information explaining the 'super' arguments ;)
| List<ExpressionBuilder> invokeSuper, | ||
| }) = _NormalConstructorBuilder; | ||
|
|
||
| /// Adds a constructor initializer. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nit] 'constructor initializer' reads a bit strange to me... how about
/// Adds a field initializer to this constructor.
| @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ final Token $deferred = new KeywordToken(Keyword.DEFERRED, 0); | |||
| /// The `/` token. | |||
| final Token $divide = new Token(TokenType.SLASH, 0); | |||
|
|
|||
| /// The `do` keyword. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we consider dropping this lint? The zero-information comments are very noisy throughout
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To make it consistent I'll drop them all in another PR.
| @@ -95,4 +95,48 @@ void main() { | |||
| ); | |||
| }); | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
| group('for statemnets', () { | |||
I don't expect anyone to get to this before the new year
Closes #50
Closes #49
Closes #47
Partial support on #43
1.0.0-beta
async,sync,sync*functionsasAwait,asYield,asYieldStartoExportBuilderandtoImportBuilderto types and referencesreturnstatements and named constructor invocations.whileanddo {} whileloop supportforandfor-insupportnamegetter forParameterBuilder/cc @alorenzen