Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dartium tests never force a full compilation #14321

Closed
rmacnak-google opened this issue Oct 22, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Dartium tests never force a full compilation #14321

rmacnak-google opened this issue Oct 22, 2013 · 5 comments
Labels
closed-duplicate Closed in favor of an existing report

Comments

@rmacnak-google
Copy link
Contributor

A recent systematic mirror exposed that dart:html contains compile-time bugs (including ones which are a problem with the VM instead of the Dart code, see Issue #11857).

@madsager
Copy link
Contributor

Removed Area-Test label.
Added Area-HTML, Triaged labels.

@ricowind
Copy link
Contributor

I am not sure I understand your issue:
We have full dartium builders that does a full build, from scratch, every time. The incremental builders does, as the name implies, only incremental builds.

Could you elaborate on your issue

@mkustermann
Copy link
Member

+asiva/iposva

Please be more specific on what you mean my "dartium tests never force a full compilation".

Is this the same as Issue #12796?
Could this be fixed by introducing '--compile_all' as we have for the standalone VM?

Moving to Area-Dartium for now.


cc @a-siva.
cc @iposva-google.
Removed Area-HTML label.
Added Area-Dartium label.

@a-siva
Copy link
Contributor

a-siva commented Oct 23, 2013

Yes I think Ryan meant the same, we can mark this bug a duplicate of issue #12796.


Added Duplicate label.
Marked as being merged into #12796.

@rmacnak-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

Right, full compilation of the Dart sources.

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-duplicate Closed in favor of an existing report
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants