Skip to content

darwinanddavis/Fraser_etal_2017

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

2 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

The value of virtual conferencing for ecology and conservation

Hannah Fraser1*, Kylie Soanes2, Stuart A. Jones3, Chris S. Jones1,4 & Matthew Malishev3

1Quantitative and Applied Ecology Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2School of Ecosystem and Forest Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
3Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis (CEBRA), School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
4Biosis Pty Ltd, Port Melbourne 3207, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*Corresponding author: Hannah Fraser

Fraser H, Soanes K, Jones C, Jones S & Malishev M (2017) The value of virtual conferencing for ecology and conservation. Conservation Biology, 31(3): 540–546, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12837.


File extensions:
.py
.R
.csv
.pdf


Abstract

The objectives of conservation science and dissemination of its research create a paradox: Conservation is about preserving the environment, yet scientists spread this message at conferences with heavy carbon footprints. Ecology and conservation science depend on global knowledge exchange–getting the best science to the places it is most needed. However, conference attendance from developed countries typically outweighs that from developing countries that are biodiversity and conservation hotspots. If any branch of science should be trying to maximize participation while minimizing carbon emissions, it is conservation. Virtual conferencing is common in other disciplines, such as education and humanities, but it is surprisingly underused in ecology and conservation. Adopting virtual conferencing entails a number of challenges, including logistics and unified acceptance, which we argue can be overcome through planning and technology. We examined four conference models: a pure-virtual model and three hybrid hub-and-node models, where hubs stream content to local nodes. These models collectively aim to mitigate the logistical and administrative challenges of global knowledge transfer. Embracing virtual conferencing addresses two essential prerequisites of modern conferences: lowering carbon emissions and increasing accessibility for remote, time- and resource-poor researchers, particularly those from developing countries.


Output



Maintainer

Matt Malishev
🔍 Website
🐦 @darwinanddavis
📧 matthew.malishev [at] gmail.com

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published