Skip to content

darwinanddavis/MalishevCivitello_biocontrol

Repository files navigation

When should we expect predator biocontrol of human schistosomes to backfire?

Matthew Malishev1* & David J Civitello1

1 Department of Biology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30322

*Corresponding author: matthew.malishev [at] gmail.com

Versions:

  • R 3.5.0
  • RStudio 1.1.453
  • Netlogo 6.0.4

File extensions:
.R
.nlogo
.c
.dll
.pdf
.html






Try not. Do or do not. There is no try.
– Jedi Master Yoda

Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests any effort to control pests and parasites is better than none. However, growing evidence demonstrates weak or moderate effort can backfire, fail, and potentially worsen outcomes versus doing nothing. A central challenge is anticipating these potential failures before inducing environmental damage. We built a resource-explicit individual-based model of human schistosome and snail host transmission to evaluate biocontrol effort by simulating 22 predator stocking densities of native prawns. We test two host mortality scenarios and show intense biocontrol effort can succeed. However, weak to moderate effort can backfire by allowing large, prolific hosts to escape predation and drive overcompensation due to three interacting ecological mechanisms—resource competition among hosts, resource-dependent infectiousness, and predator gape limits. Ultimately, integrating physiology, ecology, and epidemiology can identify the risks of weak or moderate control effort when evaluating potential ‘do or do not’ control designs for future management of wildlife pests and diseases.

Keywords: disease, predator biocontrol, individual-based model, bioenergetics, schistosome


Maintainer

Matt Malishev
🔍 Website
🐦 @darwinanddavis
📧 matthew.malishev [at] gmail.com

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published