Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Licence unspecified ? #52

Closed
rzr opened this issue May 31, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Licence unspecified ? #52

rzr opened this issue May 31, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@rzr
Copy link
Contributor

rzr commented May 31, 2016

Patch to follow

rzr added a commit to TizenTeam/hippomocks that referenced this issue May 31, 2016
file was imported from debian :
4fbd65380cdd255951079008b364516c  /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1

Bug: dascandy#52
Change-Id: I2b30dd68d575386dc92634a85bc4aff4f12e64a2
Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@osg.samsung.com>
rzr added a commit to TizenTeam/hippomocks that referenced this issue May 31, 2016
file was imported from debian :
4fbd65380cdd255951079008b364516c  /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1

Bug: dascandy#52
Origin: https://github.com/TizenTeam/hippomocks/tree/sandbox/pcoval/on/master/upstream
Change-Id: I2b30dd68d575386dc92634a85bc4aff4f12e64a2
Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@osg.samsung.com>
@rzr
Copy link
Contributor Author

rzr commented Jun 24, 2016

@rzr rzr closed this as completed Jun 24, 2016
@rzr
Copy link
Contributor Author

rzr commented Nov 30, 2017

Would it make sense to multi license headers or code,
because LGPL can be incompatible with others.

I would suggest to add Apache-2.0, MIT or BSD licences into main repo

https://help.github.com/articles/licensing-a-repository/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant