New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Licence unspecified ? #52
Comments
rzr
added a commit
to TizenTeam/hippomocks
that referenced
this issue
May 31, 2016
file was imported from debian : 4fbd65380cdd255951079008b364516c /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1 Bug: dascandy#52 Change-Id: I2b30dd68d575386dc92634a85bc4aff4f12e64a2 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@osg.samsung.com>
rzr
added a commit
to TizenTeam/hippomocks
that referenced
this issue
May 31, 2016
file was imported from debian : 4fbd65380cdd255951079008b364516c /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1 Bug: dascandy#52 Origin: https://github.com/TizenTeam/hippomocks/tree/sandbox/pcoval/on/master/upstream Change-Id: I2b30dd68d575386dc92634a85bc4aff4f12e64a2 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@osg.samsung.com>
Would it make sense to multi license headers or code, I would suggest to add Apache-2.0, MIT or BSD licences into main repo |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Patch to follow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: