Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Use explicit label for actuated #3147

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

alexellis
Copy link
Contributor

Use explicit label for actuated

The "actuated" bare label has been deprecated. We've reached out several times to have this patched for Dasch Swiss, so I'm sending a PR to make it a bit easier.

The value for the vCPU and RAM matches the default. Feel free to amend as necessary in future PRs.

Pull Request Checklist

Task Description/Number

Issue Number: DEV-

PR Type

  • build/chore: maintenance tasks (no production code change)
  • docs: documentation changes (no production code change)
  • feat: represents new features
  • fix: represents bug fixes
  • perf: performance improvements
  • refactor: represents production code refactoring
  • test: adding or refactoring tests (no production code change)

Basic requirements for bug fixes and features

  • Tests for the changes have been added
  • Docs have been added / updated

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes

Does this PR change client-test-data?

  • Yes

The "actuated" bare label has been deprecated. We've reached
out several times to have this patched for Dasch Swiss, so
I'm sending a PR to make it a bit easier.

The value for the vCPU and RAM matches the default. Feel free
to amend as necessary in future PRs.

Signed-off-by: Alex Ellis (OpenFaaS Ltd) <alexellis2@gmail.com>
@alexellis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@subotic please could you take a look? I think this may be the remaining repository using the deprecated label format for actuated.

https://docs.actuated.dev/examples/custom-vm-size/

Copy link
Collaborator

@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. @subotic can be merged, right?

Thanks @alexellis for submitting the PR!

@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt changed the title Use explicit label for actuated chore: Use explicit label for actuated Mar 26, 2024
@alexellis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @BalduinLandolt yes it should be merged, this newer label is being used elsewhere already in the organisation.

For instance: https://github.com/dasch-swiss/dsp-meta/blob/9e4f2b9ba0ee5e17525e2d386a2fc34e7194456c/.github/workflows/main.yml#L14

Alex

@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt enabled auto-merge (squash) March 26, 2024 13:04
@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt merged commit 72476e3 into dasch-swiss:main Mar 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@BalduinLandolt
Copy link
Collaborator

merged, thanks!

@alexellis alexellis deleted the actuated-set-requests branch March 26, 2024 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants