Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add test report generation for integration tests (DEV-1544) #2325

merged 2 commits into from Dec 7, 2022


Copy link

@seakayone seakayone commented Dec 7, 2022

Pull Request Checklist

Task Description/Number

Add a integration test report to our github pipeline.

See here for a run of this branch:

Closes DEV-1544

Basic Requirements

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix: represents bug fixes
  • Refactor: represents production code refactoring
  • Feature: represents a new feature
  • Documentation: documentation changes (no production code change)
  • Chore: maintenance tasks (no production code change)
  • Style: styles updates (no production code change)
  • Test: all about tests: adding, refactoring tests (no production code change)
  • Other... Please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Does this PR change client-test-data?

  • Yes (don't forget to update the JS-LIB team about the change)
  • No

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 86.95% // Head: 5.23% // Decreases project coverage by -81.71% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (bff908d) compared to base (bfe578a).
Patch coverage: 57.69% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #2325       +/-   ##
- Coverage   86.95%   5.23%   -81.72%     
  Files         242     251        +9     
  Lines       28102   28266      +164     
- Hits        24435    1481    -22954     
- Misses       3667   26785    +23118     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ain/scala/dsp/project/handler/ProjectHandler.scala 100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../src/main/scala/dsp/role/handler/RoleHandler.scala 88.00% <ø> (ø)
...c/main/scala/dsp/role/repo/impl/RoleRepoLive.scala 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...shared/src/main/scala/dsp/util/UuidGenerator.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...erface/src/main/scala/dsp/user/route/GetUser.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ce/src/main/scala/dsp/user/route/MigrateUser.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ace/src/main/scala/dsp/user/route/UserRoutes.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...c/main/scala/dsp/user/repo/impl/UserRepoLive.scala 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...sp-shared/src/main/scala/dsp/valueobjects/Id.scala 69.23% <66.66%> (+3.84%) ⬆️
...p-shared/src/main/scala/dsp/valueobjects/Iri.scala 91.75% <66.66%> (-2.93%) ⬇️
... and 220 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@seakayone seakayone self-assigned this Dec 7, 2022
@seakayone seakayone changed the title chore: Add test report generation for integration tests chore: Add test report generation for integration tests DEV-1544 Dec 7, 2022
@seakayone seakayone marked this pull request as ready for review December 7, 2022 09:40
Copy link

@BalduinLandolt BalduinLandolt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


@mpro7 mpro7 changed the title chore: Add test report generation for integration tests DEV-1544 chore: Add test report generation for integration tests (DEV-1544) Dec 7, 2022
@seakayone seakayone merged commit a61f227 into main Dec 7, 2022
9 checks passed
@seakayone seakayone deleted the wip/add-test-reports-it branch December 7, 2022 11:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants