Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Fix checks order in Group update method (DEV-3292) #3198

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mpro7
Copy link
Collaborator

@mpro7 mpro7 commented Apr 18, 2024

Pull Request Checklist

Task Description/Number

Issue Number: DEV-

PR Type

  • build/chore: maintenance tasks (no production code change)
  • docs: documentation changes (no production code change)
  • feat: represents new features
  • fix: represents bug fixes
  • perf: performance improvements
  • refactor: represents production code refactoring
  • test: adding or refactoring tests (no production code change)
  • deprecated: Deprecation warning (ideally referencing a migration guide)

Basic requirements for bug fixes and features

  • Tests for the changes have been added
  • Docs have been added / updated

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes

Does this PR change client-test-data?

  • Yes

@mpro7 mpro7 self-assigned this Apr 18, 2024
Copy link

linear bot commented Apr 18, 2024

@mpro7 mpro7 changed the title Dev 3292 7 refactor: fix checks order in Group update method (DEV-3292) Apr 19, 2024
@mpro7 mpro7 changed the title refactor: fix checks order in Group update method (DEV-3292) refactor: Fix checks order in Group update method (DEV-3292) Apr 19, 2024
@mpro7 mpro7 marked this pull request as ready for review April 19, 2024 07:58
@mpro7 mpro7 merged commit bc22ade into main Apr 19, 2024
11 of 13 checks passed
@mpro7 mpro7 deleted the dev-3292-7 branch April 19, 2024 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants