Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: don't build librocksdb for verify feature #244

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Mar 21, 2023

Conversation

iammadab
Copy link
Contributor

@iammadab iammadab commented Mar 3, 2023

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Noticed we build librocksdb-sys when building the verify feature for merk and grovedb, this should not be the case.

What was done?

Got rid of the dependency

How Has This Been Tested?

Tests pass + verification feature builds

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@iammadab iammadab changed the title merk should not build with rocksdb feat: don't build librocksdb for merk verify feature Mar 3, 2023
@iammadab iammadab marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2023 09:22
@iammadab iammadab changed the base branch from master to develop March 3, 2023 09:25
@iammadab iammadab changed the base branch from develop to master March 3, 2023 09:25
@iammadab iammadab changed the title feat: don't build librocksdb for merk verify feature feat: don't build librocksdb for verify feature Mar 3, 2023
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer changed the base branch from master to develop March 21, 2023 11:36
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer merged commit 12a1ddf into develop Mar 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants