Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: fix env syntax in release workflow #664

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2022
Merged

ci: fix env syntax in release workflow #664

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2022

Conversation

strophy
Copy link
Collaborator

@strophy strophy commented Dec 13, 2022

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Incorrect syntax for env vars, causing error Incorrect type. Expected "string".yaml-schema: GitHub Workflow

What was done?

Declare env variable correctly. See example in docs.

How Has This Been Tested?

Untested

Breaking Changes

None

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@strophy strophy added this to the v0.24.0 milestone Dec 13, 2022
@shumkov
Copy link
Member

shumkov commented Dec 13, 2022

Please merge v0.24-dev on it

Copy link
Member

@shumkov shumkov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@shumkov shumkov changed the title ci: fix env syntax ci: fix env syntax in release workflow Dec 14, 2022
@shumkov shumkov merged commit 7bf6b77 into v0.24-dev Dec 14, 2022
@shumkov shumkov deleted the ci/fix-rust-env branch December 14, 2022 04:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants