Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache #10880

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

fjetter
Copy link
Member

@fjetter fjetter commented Feb 1, 2024

This is required for dask/dask-expr#798

I haven't really tried to understand why the one test now no longer deviates. I guess the previous deviation was a caching bug and the cache in dask/dask-expr#798 is a little more specific.

Note: This one test will now fail on the dask-expr test branch until dask/dask-expr#798 is merged as well

@fjetter fjetter changed the title A couple of dask-expr fixes for parquet A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache in dask-expr Feb 1, 2024
@fjetter fjetter changed the title A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache in dask-expr A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache Feb 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Unit Test Results

See test report for an extended history of previous test failures. This is useful for diagnosing flaky tests.

     15 files  ± 0       15 suites  ±0   3h 10m 12s ⏱️ - 1m 50s
 12 985 tests + 1   12 054 ✅ ± 0     929 💤 ±0  2 ❌ +1 
160 200 runs  +11  143 625 ✅ +10  16 573 💤 ±0  2 ❌ +1 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6758d14. ± Comparison against base commit 0eab32e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Comment on lines +191 to +192
def __dask_tokenize__(self):
return tokenize(self.name, self.keys)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should include the type as well

@phofl phofl merged commit daf1f7c into dask:main Feb 2, 2024
25 of 28 checks passed
@phofl
Copy link
Collaborator

phofl commented Feb 2, 2024

thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants