Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LocalCluster: discrepancy default option code & documentation #8060

Closed
Danferno opened this issue Aug 1, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #8073
Closed

LocalCluster: discrepancy default option code & documentation #8060

Danferno opened this issue Aug 1, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #8073
Labels
documentation Improve or add to documentation good first issue Clearly described and easy to accomplish. Good for beginners to the project.

Comments

@Danferno
Copy link
Contributor

Danferno commented Aug 1, 2023

Describe the issue:
The default scheduler port of a LocalCluster is 0 (random port), not 8786 as mentioned in the documentation.

Minimal Complete Verifiable Example:

# Put your MCVE code here

Anything else we need to know?:

Environment:

  • Dask version: dask-2023.7.1 distributed-2023.7.1
  • Python version: 3.11.0
  • Operating System:
  • Install method (conda, pip, source):
@phofl
Copy link
Collaborator

phofl commented Aug 1, 2023

Hi, thx for the report. Adjusted the docs sounds good. Are you interested in submitting a PR?

@phofl phofl added documentation Improve or add to documentation and removed needs triage labels Aug 1, 2023
@jrbourbeau jrbourbeau transferred this issue from dask/dask Aug 1, 2023
@hendrikmakait hendrikmakait added the good first issue Clearly described and easy to accomplish. Good for beginners to the project. label Aug 1, 2023
@Danferno
Copy link
Contributor Author

Danferno commented Aug 4, 2023

I think I did that now, never done it before though so apologies if I did something wrong

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improve or add to documentation good first issue Clearly described and easy to accomplish. Good for beginners to the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants