Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update celery and other outdated 3rd party URLs #5988

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2022
Merged

Conversation

graingert
Copy link
Member

@graingert graingert commented Mar 24, 2022

celery/celeryproject#52

  • Closes #xxxx
  • Tests added / passed
  • Passes pre-commit run --all-files

I've only fixed the actual broken/redirecting URLs but I've got some suggestions on cleaning up some cosmetic/consistency issues other URLs

.. _Dispy: http://dispy.sourceforge.net/
.. _Pyro: https://pythonhosted.org/Pyro4/
.. _Dispy: https://dispy.org/
.. _Pyro: https://pyro4.readthedocs.io/
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be

Suggested change
.. _Pyro: https://pyro4.readthedocs.io/
.. _Pyro: https://pyro5.readthedocs.io/

as pyro4 is eol now

@@ -72,14 +72,14 @@ There are a couple of older projects that often get mentioned
* Pyro_: Remote objects / RPC

.. _Luigi: https://luigi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

imho it's better to link to the top level rtd URL - as publishers can choose which branch/version to redirect to in their "advanced settings" https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versions.html#redirects-on-root-urls

Suggested change
.. _Luigi: https://luigi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
.. _Luigi: https://luigi.readthedocs.io/

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eg https://luigi.readthedocs.io goes to en/stable and https://scoop.readthedocs.io/ goes to io/0.7

@@ -72,14 +72,14 @@ There are a couple of older projects that often get mentioned
* Pyro_: Remote objects / RPC

.. _Luigi: https://luigi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
.. _MPI4Py: http://mpi4py.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
.. _MPI4Py: https://mpi4py.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
.. _PyZMQ: https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be the rtd URL?

Suggested change
.. _PyZMQ: https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq
.. _PyZMQ: https://pyzmq.readthedocs.io/

.. _PyZMQ: https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq
.. _Celery: http://www.celeryproject.org/
.. _Celery: https://docs.celeryq.dev/
.. _`IPython Parallel`: https://ipyparallel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
.. _Scoop: https://github.com/soravux/scoop/
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be the rtd URL?

Suggested change
.. _Scoop: https://github.com/soravux/scoop/
.. _Scoop: https://scoop.readthedocs.io/

Copy link
Member

@fjetter fjetter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that it's much nicer to link to the docs and to stay consistent with our links. Thanks @graingert

@fjetter fjetter merged commit 0b10b03 into dask:main Mar 24, 2022
@graingert graingert deleted the patch-1 branch March 24, 2022 11:04
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

       12 files  +       12         12 suites  +12   6h 11m 47s ⏱️ + 6h 11m 47s
  2 669 tests +  2 669    2 588 ✔️ +  2 588    81 💤 +  81  0 ±0 
15 942 runs  +15 942  15 097 ✔️ +15 097  845 💤 +845  0 ±0 

Results for commit e5aeeff. ± Comparison against base commit 9d3064a.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants