Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

_varargs_labels_as_list test #597

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tiddoloos
Copy link

[ ] Wrote test for _varargs_labels_as_list

Changes proposed:
tests for _varargs_labels_as_list

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 93.535% (+0.08%) from 93.455% when pulling a2c0ca3 on tiddoloos:master into ec3ebcd on data-8:master.

Copy link
Member

@adnanhemani adnanhemani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In most languages, testing "private" or "internal" functions is not a pattern that is encouraged (if that pattern even allows it at all). While I appreciate the additional test coverage these tests provide greatly, I think it would be best if we made test cases using Table#drop and Table#select to trigger all the conditional statements within Table#_varargs_labels_as_list instead. Let me know your thoughts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants