Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
65 lines (47 loc) · 6.31 KB

File metadata and controls

65 lines (47 loc) · 6.31 KB

DataCap and CID Checker Report1

  • Organization: FileDriveLabs
  • Client: f146dbcnpkwoabe2zu5z67ti3cfltuxxxttvgoxwa

Approvers

1a1991car
1cryptowhizzard
1kernelogic
1luobin544
1TimGuo7

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

  • Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
  • Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
  • Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
  • All storage providers should be located in different regions.

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Provider Location Total Deals Sealed Percentage Unique Data Duplicate Deals
f01993388 Boardman, Oregon, US
Amazon.com, Inc.
150.47 TiB 28.75% 124.70 TiB 17.12%
f01984593 Ashburn, Virginia, US
Amazon.com, Inc.
119.88 TiB 22.90% 119.88 TiB 0.00%
f01993339 Singapore, Singapore, SG
Amazon.com, Inc.
74.98 TiB 14.32% 74.98 TiB 0.00%
f01984576 Singapore, Singapore, SG
HUAWEI CLOUDS
86.40 TiB 16.51% 86.40 TiB 0.00%
f01984586 Bangkok, Bangkok, TH
HUAWEI CLOUDS
66.72 TiB 12.75% 66.72 TiB 0.00%
f01984580 Singapore, Singapore, SG
HUAWEI CLOUDS
25.00 TiB 4.78% 25.00 TiB 0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

  • No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Unique Data Size Total Deals Made Number of Providers Deal Percentage
125.14 TiB 125.14 TiB 1 23.91%
111.41 TiB 248.58 TiB 2 47.49%
49.91 TiB 149.73 TiB 3 28.60%

Deal Data Shared with other Clients2

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client Application Total Deals Affected Unique CIDs Approvers
f1sejgqbuwsf74qifuxqykwotyu5aswuwhubxghqa FileDrive Labs 467.77 TiB 5,307 5cryptowhizzard
2Joss-Hua
3kernelogic
2newwebgroup
1stcouldlisa
f1bycr5r3ymkgqvkuxoemgsmnuawyawptwj44mqdi FileDrive Labs 392.69 TiB 7,178 11ane-1
2cryptowhizzard
1Joss-Hua
2kernelogic
1NDLABS-OFFICE
1newwebgroup
1stcouldlisa
1steven004
f14uhjnqrocqcenbjfaergw2uvaimysi4snv2oepy FileDrive Labs 376.63 TiB 5,926 11ane-1
3cryptowhizzard
1Joss-Hua
3kernelogic
1NDLABS-OFFICE
1newwebgroup
1stcouldlisa
1steven004
f1w7oommwezzhsyfh4ax7tbtd7zgl6i4m6hvnvd4i FileDriveLabs 208.33 TiB 5,072 1cryptowhizzard
1Joss-Hua
1kernelogic
1mikezli

Footnotes

  1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

  2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...